A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development performs at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, look for to construct their loved ones property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their prospective neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both people of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their planning authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore regions are topic to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where views of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times described, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the water through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website turned The most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been protected intimately from the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as readers sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to even further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital moment within the lawful timeline.
On the Main of your dispute is actually a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as built, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and conditions hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their action is motivated by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A non-public look at, insisting rather that it is about making sure that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they may have described their extended-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply looking to build a household home in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be completed based upon professional tips and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with coming into The ocean all through a storm, do not change the fundamental points.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for the predicament that lots of observers see as ever more widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical actuality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result remains uncertain. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as designed complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing circumstances. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful expenditures are already paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than development operates at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 underscores how immediately an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles like environmental defense and property rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful queries. No matter if it can ultimately be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.